🔗 Share this article

Established political parties are increasingly allowing the radical right to dictate the political agenda, according to a recent research conducted in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics found that this trend has unwittingly helped radical groups by validating their viewpoints and disseminating them more widely.

Study Based on Over 20 Years of Media Coverage

The findings, published in the academic journal on political studies, relied on an computerized content review of over 520,000 news pieces from a half-dozen national publications.

Berlin-based researchers observed that as the far right moved from marginal topics in the late 1990s to core themes like assimilation and migration, established parties increasingly adjusted their messaging in response.

This adaptation boosted the dissemination of these concepts and indicated to voters that such positions were legitimate.

Implications for Democratic Systems

"Political discourse by mainstream parties is crucial in the electoral success of the far right," explained a political sociologist participating in the study.

"This element has been overlooked," she noted.

The impact was evident even when conventional groups were criticising the radical faction. "They still receive focus," the researcher remarked. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this attention is crucial."

Normalisation Phenomenon Across Europe

While the study was focused on the German context, this mainstreaming phenomenon is probable to affect countries across the European continent.

"You see this a lot in German and British news outlets," explained another researcher. "Radical groups makes a statement and everyone begins discussing it for one week."

"Although you're countering it, you're repeating it," he stated.

Hardening of Political Rhetoric

At times, political figures have also toughened their discourse to align with that of the far right.

In a recently published interview, a then national leader advocated widespread expulsions and pushed for them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable instances can be observed across Europe, as elected officials from nations ranging from the United Kingdom to France adopt the language of the radical right, especially on immigration.

This has formed an feedback loop that was unthinkable a decade ago.

Core Problem: Who Sets the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist party and you are talking about cultural issues – migration, integration – in a way that is determined by the rhythm of the radical right, that's the essence of agenda setting," explained a researcher.

Other political parties have gone one step further, seeking to copy the strict agenda of the radical right, despite studies suggests that doing so drives the electorate to cast their ballot for the radical faction.

Progressive Impact and Voter Awareness

The scope of information gathered showed that the influence of radical groups had been progressive and had grown with the passage of time.

"Voter awareness doesn't change from one day to another," stated a co-author. "However, when you encounter this negative framing around immigration frequently, and it is being disseminated not only by radical groups but also, for instance, by established parties, then of course this storyline gains more traction."

Need for Established Parties to Develop Their Own Narratives

The study highlighted the need for mainstream political parties to carve out their distinct narratives, particularly on topics such as immigration and integration, rather than constantly following the far right.

"It resembles a choreography," said one researcher. "When the leader is far-right and you're reacting to it, you lose the ability to choose which tune should be playing."