🔗 Share this article

Throughout financial booms, there come moments when financial analysts wonder whether exuberance has become excessive.

Recent multi-billion dollar deals involving OpenAI with semiconductor makers NVIDIA along with AMD have raised concerns regarding the viability of massive investments in AI systems.

Why these NVIDIA & AMD Deals Concerning to Financial Observers?

Some commentators express apprehension about the reciprocal nature in these arrangements. According to the conditions of the Nvidia transaction, OpenAI will pay the chipmaker in cash to acquire processors, and the company commits to invest in OpenAI for minority shares.

Leading UK tech backer James Anderson expressed concern about similarities with vendor financing, where a business provides financial support for a customer buying its products – a precarious situation if these buyers hold excessively positive business forecasts.

Vendor financing was among the characteristics of that turn-of-the-millennium dotcom bubble.

"It's not exactly like the practices numerous telecommunications suppliers engaged in in 1999-2000, but it has certain rhymes with that period. I don't think it makes me feeling completely at ease in that perspective of view," commented Anderson.

The Advanced Micro Devices arrangement also enmeshes OpenAI alongside another chip maker in addition to Nvidia. Through this deal, OpenAI will use hundreds of thousands of AMD chips within its datacentres – the core infrastructure of artificial intelligence systems such as ChatGPT – and gaining the option to purchase 10% of AMD.

Everything of this is fueled by the thirst of OpenAI and its peers to secure the maximum processing capacity as possible to drive AI systems toward ever greater capability breakthroughs – as well as to meet expanding user needs.

Neil Wilson, UK market strategist at financial firm Saxo, stated how transactions such as those between Nvidia & OpenAI all suggested a situation which "looks, feels and talks like an economic bubble."

What Are the Other Indicators Pointing to a Bubble?

Anderson flagged skyrocketing market values at leading AI companies to be a further source for worry. OpenAI currently worth $500 billion (£372 billion), versus $157bn in October last year, while Anthropic nearly tripled its valuation recently, rising from $60bn in March to $170 billion the previous month.

Anderson stated that the magnitude behind these valuation surges "did bother him." According to accounts, OpenAI reportedly recorded sales amounting to $4.3 billion in the initial six months of this year, alongside operational losses of $7.8 billion, according to tech publication The Information.

Latest stock value swings have also alarmed seasoned financial watchers. For instance, AMD temporarily added $80bn to its market cap throughout equity trading this past Monday after OpenAI's news, whereas Oracle – one profiting due to demand for AI infrastructure like datacentres – added approximately $250bn in one day in September following announcing stronger than anticipated results.

There is also a huge capital expenditure boom, meaning spending on non-personnel costs such as buildings and hardware. The major quartet artificial intelligence "large-scale operators" – Facebook owner Meta, Alphabet's parent Alphabet, Microsoft together with Amazon – are projected to spend $325bn on capex in the current year, approximately the economic output of Portugal.

Is Artificial Intelligence Implementation Warranting Market Enthusiasm?

Faith toward the AI boom was rattled in August after the Massachusetts Institute of Technology published a study indicating how ninety-five percent of companies are getting zero return from their investments in generative AI. Their report stated the issue lay not in the quality of AI systems but how they were used.

The report indicated this represented a clear example of the "genAI divide", with startups led by 19- or 20-year-olds noting significant increases in income from deploying AI technologies.

The report coincided with a heavy fall in AI support stocks including Nvidia as well as Oracle. It came 60 days after consulting firm McKinsey, the consulting firm, said that four out of five companies state they utilize generative AI, however the same proportion report minimal effect on their bottom line.

McKinsey explained this occurs since AI systems are utilized toward general purposes such as creating conference summaries rather than targeted purposes including identifying problematic vendors or producing ideas.

All here worries backers because a key commitment by AI companies like Alphabet, OpenAI and Microsoft remains how when you buy their products, these will improve productivity – an indicator of economic performance – through enabling an individual worker produce significantly greater profitable output in an average working day.

However, there are other obvious indications of a widespread embrace of AI. Recently, OpenAI stated how ChatGPT currently used by 800 million people a week, up from the number of 500 million mentioned by the company in March. Sam Altman, OpenAI’s CEO, strongly believes how demand for paid-for services to AI is going to persist in "sharply rise."

What the Overall Situation Reveal?

Adrian Cox, an investment strategist at Deutsche Bank's research division, states the current situation seem as if "we are at a pivotal point when signals show different colours."

Warning signs, he says, include massive capital expenditure wherein "existing versions of processors might become outdated prior to spending yields returns" together with rapidly increasing valuations of privately-held firms like OpenAI.

Cautionary indicators are a more than doubling of the share prices belonging to the "magnificent seven" US technology stocks. This is offset through their P/E ratios – a measure of whether a stock is under- or overvalued – that remain below past averages